Case ID: 615
Publication date: 16 Sep, 2024
Consensus grade: I would not grade this tumor
Show diagnosis by expert panel membersUser | Diagnosis | Difficulty | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
Pathologist 1 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 2 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 3 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 4 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 5 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 6 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 7 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 8 | WHO/ISUP grade 1 | Typical | |
Pathologist 9 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical |
oncocytoma |
Pathologist 10 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 11 | WHO/ISUP grade 2 | Borderline higher | |
Pathologist 12 | WHO/ISUP grade 3 | Typical |
R/o oncocytoma |
Pathologist 13 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 14 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 15 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 16 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 17 | WHO/ISUP grade 2 | Typical | |
Pathologist 18 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical | |
Pathologist 19 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical |
perhaps RO? |
Pathologist 20 | I would not grade this tumor | Typical |
Case description (by case creator):
oncocytoma biopsy