Either ductal or IDC component

Find it difficult distinguishing 3+4 from 4+3 on separate images as some same area at different magnification.
Some of the cribriform glands may be intraductal cancer.

need better low power image
? is some IDC-P

difficult to say whether "+4 or 4+3, because I cannot estimate which part is predominant on the pics. But 4 has to be in as well as 3

Nice classic histologic patterns, but hard to tell relative percentage of each component

Should be straightformard but close to 50:50 3:4.

Depends on the overall amount of 4 - low power overview image of the entire core would likely create greater agreement on 4+3 vs 3+4

difficult to estimate the amount of 3 and 4 by images; could be 4+3

Since photo 1 is the same as 6 iand the others are different, is difficult to gauge the amounts of 3 and 4. If all are considered different fields of 1 slide them cribriform 4 predominates

is that cribriform area intraductal - does that make it 3+3 then!!

Definitely both patterns 4 and 3 but it's tricky to estimate the relative percentages off the screen. I thinks it's about 40% pattern 4 and have graded it accordingly but can see others estimating the pattern 4 slightly higher. Also considered IDC-P and HGPIN focally and might have done a 34betaE12/p63 stain, depending on what the rest of the case looked like. Not convinced that there is a ductal adenocarcinoma component.